Middle View – Not the Left, nor the Right, but in the middle, ideally with Common Sense and Fairness

2019/01 Whiner of the Week – Chuck Schummer

This week’s Whiner of the Week is none other than Chuck Schumer.  At this time, January 11th, 2019, parts of the Federal government are in a partial shutdown condition because of a lack of the House, the Senate, and the President from coming to terms on a budget.

President Trump in his campaign speeches promised to build a wall for $25 billion dollars and have Mexico pay for this wall.  The $25B was an extraordinary amount as there is probably no need to stretch a wall from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico, a total of 1,954 miles.  And having Mexico pay for it was probably not going to happen. 

The Democrats have jumped on these two talking points with glee.  After all the President said he would, right?

Trump’s campaign promises to have Mexico pay for the wall, were really just campaign promises.  How many politicians have made campaign promises that they did not keep?  Surely the Democrats understand that what you promise in a campaign does not mean you need to keep your word… Trump is new this political game. He is still a Greenhorn.

Since then Trump has reduced the request to $5.6B dollars while the Dems are only offering $1.3B in “Border Security,” but not to be used on the fence or wall. $5.6B will only build about 200 miles of border. But the idea is to place this new wall in strategic locations to buttress the existing barriers.

Some have called the non-walled high-tech border security just “bells and whistles”.  Border Patrol would still have to respond to alarms and some have said it would be easy to keep the Boarder Patrol occupied with false alarms.  While one can joke about lasers zapping moving objects coming over the fence, no one is talking about this kind of high-tech security.

Small walls don’t seem to pose a challenge for these two ladies.

Trump is up against Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, both highly seasoned and partisan politicians each with a long history of “kicking the can down the road”.  They are ready to wait it out and have nothing to lose.   They are content with the Status Quo. Nancy has plans to step down and Chuck is from a non-border state that benefits greatly from under-the-table labor. They both have voted for border walls in the past and understand that in politics, being a Hypocrite is not always held against you.

Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi, now Speaker of the House, and representing California’s 12th district.  The 12th district, geographically, is the City of San Francisco.  San Francisco, basically her district, was called out by the United Nations on Oct 18th 2018, and Oakland, as the only two cities in the US that are part of a “global scandal”, that contain homeless encampments that are “cruel and inhumane”. 

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House
Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House

San Francisco is a Sanctuary City that provides a number of measures to prevent illegal aliens from being reported to Immigration.  This allows them to compete with the homeless for housing, in effect, enlarging the homeless population. California’s state government has stated that California needs 3.5 million new housing units. Given the shortage of housing rents and costs are near the highest in the nation. More immigrants means more money for housing. If Nancy’s district is the one of the two worst areas in the US for taking care of people, how can she state, “Come one, come all, we shall shelter you from all of the cruelty in this world?”.

Chuck Schumer – A Weekly Whiner

Chuck Schumer, Senator from the State of New York and minority leader of the Senate, has also refused to budge.  Considerations upon solving DACA and reopening the government have not swayed him in his resolve against Trump.  Trump has been a controversial figure on the New York scene for years and support for Trump would cause him to lose tremendous face.  Recently Leticia James was elected to Attorney General for NYC. She is part of the hard left attempting to get rid of Trump thru any means. Her campaign video is brutal. This is what Trump faces every hour, of every day.

New York is not a border state, but it does receive an large influx of visitors thru its airports.  Travelers coming thru have been checked at their point of departures, and they are checked again at the airport by Pass Port Screeners.  The southern border states have no luxury of congenial official airport Pass Port Screeners along the border.  If we are to have open borders, do we still need Pass Port Screeners?

With the government shutdown numerous agencies are being shutdown.  TSA, which provides security for Airports, including New York’s La Guardia, have been reportedly experiencing a Blue Fever which is a large number of employees calling in sick, because of lack of pay. 

New York City, in 2007, was estimated to have over a half a million illegal and undocumented immigrants.  40 percent of these immigrants came from south of the US/Mexican border.  For example, 54% of the dishwashers in New York City are said to be illegally in the country.  The numbers, 12 years later, must be higher now.  Half of the carpenters also have the same status.   If they were all to pick up and leave, wages would have to rise a substantial amount in order to entice locals to pick up the slack.   And it is generally thought locals might not work as hard either.

Chuck Schumer has tremendous pressure from his constituents to keep things the way they are.  New York is already an expensive place to eat out and New Yorkers love their restaurants.   They also love their Nannies, Maids, Day Laborers, and Landscapers. Cost is one factor in a number of cases. No Social Security tax, no Medicare tax, no health insurance, and no minimum wage. Working conditions in a number of the jobs are more than the average American would tolerate. Chuck is reluctant to rock this boat.

Trumps campaign promise of a $25B Wall has now shrunk to a $5.6B fence constructed in strategic places, buttressing the existing fence or barrier.  You don’t hear Chuck arguing for tearing down existing portions of the “Immoral” fence.   Once again, whatever is the “Status Quo” is just fine.

Trump has also not done well in his presentation of the need.  On January 4th he held a press conference where he almost looked presidential.  ICE and Border Security were present and stated a fence was necessary and would help.  

Some have questioned how a more secure fence would help.  It certainly did not stop the recent caravans coming to seek asylum. The caravans are in a sense an answer to safety, as making your way across the desert to border entry points that have sparse patrols with minimal fencing.  A desert crossing can be unsafe for men and women. Because of the ease of entry at the points represents what might be termed an, “Attractive Nuisance“, which is a legal term that states maybe it’s too easy to cross the border. In 2014 National Geographic published an article about the “Busy Pipeline” of illegals . This article describes the “Rape Trees” where migrant girls are raped and killed by their coyotes. It also describes a Rancher, Hollek, who says, “He won’t eat hog caught south of Highway 285 because the chances of it having fed on a dead human being are too high”.

On the southern border, there have been many reported sightings of these Rape Trees.
On the southern border, there have been many reported sightings of these Rape Trees.

Trump needs to be a kinder and gentler president.   He still thinks he is in campaign mode, rather than executive mode.  He might find that if he were kinder, and did more explaining, he might make more headway.

If Barack Obama had wanted $5B for an additional 200 miles of partial fence, buttressing strategic areas of the borders, both Chuck and Nancy would most likely have bent over backwards to help.  They might have even helped Barack legalize the DACA issue.

Some of the non leadership Democrats, Jackie Speier’s for instance, have stated they would trade DACA for the border wall money. But the Democratic leadership team of Chuck and Nancy, and the far left of the party are not ready to budge.

Since the Democrats have taken over the house just recently, it looks like they are not in the mood to deal.   We may be headed for a news heavy next two years.   Trump needs to find a way to make Nancy and Chuck look like winners.

The Immigration problem is not going to go away. With free healthcare for all being discussed, a new magnet to America will soon be added as folks with health issues cross the border. It can be expensive to provide full healthcare for anyone who finds themselves within the US border but some think the US is ready for it.

But on the other hand, America needs the appropriate workers to succeed in the global marketplace. Our educational system does not produce the type of workers we need, hence, we look offshore for legal immigration thru the H1B visa program. Trump has talked about a path to citizenship for them.

California’s Imperial Beach
Border Guard guarding California’s Imperial Beach
Jim Acosta safely behind an Obama era wall.
Jim Acosta huddling behind a wall, reporting ironically there is no border emergency where he is standing. But, is that because a wall constructed during the Obama administration is protecting him?

Famous Quotes:

Chuck view today, and in 2009.
Chuck Schumer has changed his tune. He and New York do not get along with Trump. But in the past, under a different President. He had a different viewpoint. Nancy has also “Immorally” voted for a Wall in the Past.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, 2009: “People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who enter the U.S. legally. The American people will never accept immigration reform unless they truly believe that their government is committed to ending future illegal immigration.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 2008: “We do need to address the issue of immigration and the challenge we have of undocumented people in our country. We certainly do not want any more coming in.”

Barack Obama, 2005: “We simply cannot allow people to pour into the U.S. undocumented, undetected, unchecked, circumventing the people who are waiting patiently, diligently, lawfully to become immigrants in this country.”

Barack Obama, 2014: This short video shows him describing a “Border Crisis” regarding children being brought in. One must admit, he does look more presidential than Donald Trump.

Hillary Clinton, 2014: “I voted numerous times when I was a senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in and I do think you have to control your borders.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, 2007: “I don’t know why we need millions of people to be coming into the country who will work for lower wages than American workers and drives wages down even lower than they are right now.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell: “The only things that have changed between then and now are the political winds, and of course, the occupant of the White House. So this is no newfound principled objection; it’s just political spite. A partisan tantrum being prioritized over the public interest.

The last quote, when viewing the quotes preceding it, sums things up nicely.

German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, 2018-Nov-21 at a Konrad Adenauer Foundation event in Berlin: “Nation states must today be prepared to give up their sovereignty”. She also stated, “Ceding power to a superstate is a better form of patriotism.” For Germany this is the EU, for America, the UN.

2018/43 Whiner of the Week – Donald Trump

Donald Trump - wikiCommons
2018-Week 43 - Donald Trump - FBI Headquarters needs to stay put?

This weeks Weekly Whiner is none other than Donald Trump. The FBI has been trying to get a new headquarters to replace the aging (J Edgar) Hoover Building, built in 1971, on Pennsylvania Avenue. About four blocks east of the White House. And about a block away, across the street, kitty-korner, from the Trump International Hotel which is located in the Old Post Office building.

A lot of good controversy in the total story here for folks with ATDS (Acquired Trump Derangement Syndrome).  But, my main issue is the following.

What is the Big Deal?

Having so many FBI members in one place, and in DC is akin to US Navy on Dec 7, 1941 having just about every battle ship in port.  Lined up in a nice pretty row and just waiting to be sunk.

USS Virgina burns on Dec 7, 1941 in Pearl Harbor. It would be bad to see 80% of the FBI assets taken out in one juicy strike at the heart of DC.

 

Pearl Harbor, Dec 7, 1941, USS Virginia burning along “Battleship Row”. Clustering all your assets in one place is DUMB. (Photo Courtesy of WikiCommons)

Our premier police agency deserves and needs to be more geographically distributed.   One cheap and easy to smuggle in Nuclear Device. As in the style of one of my favorite movies, True Lies, encased in lead, in the back of a rental truck, is all it would take to bring DC down.  And with it our cadre of well trained and experienced FBI agents.

Something also tells me it would also be cheaper in other parts of the country to pay and house these agents.  And have them be quickly available when issues pop up around the country.   With modern technology, they could still easily communicate and work as a team. The total team, their data centers, and their equipment, needs to be distributed.

I always look at fondness at the US Government Printing
Office in Pueblo, Colorado. 

Would Trump, if he knew about this Printing Office, want to
give them a central office building in DC to consolidate all in one location? 

More of the US government should be scattered about the
country as both a cost saving measure, to spread the wealth and knowledge of
the Federal Workers across the land, and to prevent one singular terrorist
disaster from taking out our FBI, and other key government agencies.

Of course, the FBI should maintain a presence in DC, but 11,000 agents?  If they must fly to San Francisco, California they need five hours of air time.  Why not put some of them in Kansas?

As discussions and funding to replace the building have occurred, there have been calls to distribute the FBI employee load to multiple locations.  This is one way to drain the swamp.  But Trump has acted like the little Dutch Boy using his finger in the dike to plug the leak.

Little Dutch Boy Plugging a Dike. Trump does not want any workers to work other then in DC? The Education Dept can live in DC. But, why put almost all of our experienced workers there?

 

The Little Dutch Boy, true or not, a good analogy for someone trying to boost DC employment rather then distributing workers around the country spreading the pie. (Photo Courtesy of wikiCommons)

The Story: 

An easy to read timeline exists below in this article.  But in Nov/2011, the GSA started a study to find a way to replace the Hoover Building.  After millions of dollars and hours of research they came up with three other places, in the suburbs.  Meanwhile, Trump, before he announced his candidacy, expressed interest in the site for a hotel, and acquired the Old Post Office across the street from the Hoover Building.  Donald Trump becomes president, dismisses Comey, the head of the FBI, and starts to take a bit too much interest in the study.  The study gets cancelled in Jul/2017.

Old Post Office Building in Washington DC, 2012. In this year the GSA stated it would entertain 3rd party proposals for the property. 2013/Aug - A Trump LLC leased the property. 22 Months later in 2015/Jun, Trump announced his candidacy for the presidency. He was swore in in 2017/Jan. Making the lease validity open to interpretation.

 

The Old Post Office Building in Washing DC, in 2012, before it became the Trump International Hotel – Photograph by Mike Peel (www.mikepeel.net)

Trump appears to favor instead replacing the existing
building with a new building and moving some of the agents to Quantico,
Virginia where the FBI has an existing training facility.

FBI Headquarters, built in 1971. The GSA in their first plan wanted to demo the building, offer it to another developer, and re-create a monolithic FBI HQ in a nearnby suburb. Some have said Trump is afraid of a competitor to his Trump International Hotel across the street.

 

FBI Headquarters, built in 1971, the controversy is to build on this site, or in 3 other locations the GSA determined are best. WikiCommons

Critics of Trump have these issues (related to the Hoover Building):

  1. The lease of the Old Post Office could be illegal as he is now an elected official. However the GSA ruled in Mar/2017, with the new legal setup, the lease is still valid.   Trump doesn’t benefit as today, legally, he is not the owner, but after he leaves office, he could.
  2. Some have said his hotel would get more valuable business if the building was replaced rather then picking another location per the original studies recommendations.
  3. Some have also said Trump fears another Hotel chain may acquire the Hoover building and present competition to his “Trump International Hotel”
  4. The swamp was going to be partially drained, as some 2300 FBI agents would have transferred to other parts of the country.  But, Trump in his zeal, is preventing a distributed deployment of agents across the country.  More agents should be distributed across the country.  Even in what [tooltips keyword=”Blue Coasters” content=”Blue Coasters are the culturally elite members of the Illuminati that regard middle America as flyover states.”] call the flyover states.

Ideally the FBI could have a small office in DC, where the center of government presently is.  But, could more of the FBI be more evenly distributed about the country?   If Trump really wanted to drain the swamp he could have asked that the FBI Headquarters be distributed and, located in another area of the country.

Trump instead appears to favor instead replacing the existing building with a new building, protecting his existing hotel from competition?, and moving some of the agents to Quantico, Virginia where the FBI has an existing training facility.

For years the GSA had told both the Bush and Obama administrations that the Edgar J. Hoover building needed to be replaced and a new secure site was required in suburban DC to consolidate 11,000 FBI employees on one site.

Trump has failed to even try and drain the swamp in this
case.  Here he has an opportunity.  And instead he wants to fertilize the swamp.

His naysayers are crying over spilt-milk regarding his lease as it occurred long before his candidacy.  They do have a case if he is trying to prevent another hotel chain from competing with his hotel in the old post office.

FBI
Headquarters Timeline

2018-Dec-04 – With the House in Democratic hands, the new head of the House Oversight Committee US Representative Gerald Connolly announced he would lead an inquiry into the cancellation of the original study recommendations.

2018-Feb-12 – Asst Attorney General Lee Lofthus announces a plan to build a modern and secure building across the street from the (J. Edgar) Hoover Building.  Instead of 11,000 agents on this site.  2,300 to be split out to Huntsville, Alabama for explosive analysis  Pocotel, Idaho would receive the a data center,  Clarksburg, West Virginia, would receive Criminal Justice, data center, and Biometrics.  Leaving 10,000 at the original site.

2018-Aug-27 – An Inspector
General
report shows Donald Trump was more involved in the decisions to
scrap plans to move to either Maryland or Virginia.

2018-Jan-24 – Two meetings are held about the FBI
project.  The first in Chief of Staff
John Kelly’s office.  The second in the
Oval Office confirming an Inspector General report about Trump’s intervention.   Trump appears to care about the FBI
headquarter location.

2017-Jul-10 – The FBI Headquarters search is cancelled.  It had started in Nov of 2011.  Prior to the cancellation the locations under
consideration were; Greenbelt Maryland, Landover Maryland, or Springfield
Virginia.

2017-May-19 – FBI Director, James Comey is dismissed.

2017-Mar-23 – The GSA issues a report stating the President’s Lease is legal.  The lease does contain a clause; “No member or delegate to Congress, or elected official of the Government of the United States … shall be admitted to any share or part of this Lease.”

2015-Jun-16 – Donald Trump Announces his campaign for
President

2014-Jul-23 – Groundbreaking of the Trump International
Hotel occurs.

2014-Mar-03 – The “Trump Old Post Office Building LLC”,
consumates a Lease
with the GSA to lease the space at

2013-Aug-05 – The “Trump Old Post Office LLC”, creates the first
ground lease
with the GSA.   This is
22 months before Trump’s announcement to run as a candidate for the Presidency.

2012-Dec-03 – GSA states it would entertain proposals to
swap the Hoover building for larger parcel outside of the city.

2011-Nov – GSA Starts a study to find a new location to
replace the (J. Edgar) Hoover FBI building.

2018/34 Whiner of the Week – Omarosa Manigault Newman

Weekly Whiner
Weekly Whiner
2018-Week 34 - Whiner of the Week - Omarosa, loves to tape people unknowingly in secure places

On or around Aug 12, 2018 Omarosa Manigault Newman released a tape from the White House by Chief of Staff John Kelly last December. She was fired from her White House job last December in 2017. Her last day was supposed to January 20, 2018.

n the time between her firing she has appeared on numerous talk shows and she has been writing a new book, “Unhinged”.  The book was announced on July 26th.  Then on August 12th Omarosa started releasing tapes which immediately upped interest in her as she began the talk show circuit.

Since August 12th a new tape has surfaced almost each day in Omarosa’s attempts to maintain her relevancy trundles along.  The timing of her tape releases are forcing the Talk Shows to discuss her.  As Stephen Colbert pointed out on his Tuesday, August 14th late show, “Every aspect of the story is salacious, including the fact that the NDAs Trump has everyone around him sign are borderline useless.  Yes, it would seem the NDA’s that the women around Trump have signed, mean nothing.

Event Timeline:

1996 – Bachelor’s Degree in Journalism.

1998 – Worked for Vice President Al Gore with the title of “Special Assistant of Logistics”.  She later stated the job had been “a very difficult environment, because they don’t believe in training. They just kind of throw you in the fire.”

2004 – First appearance as a contestant in the “The Apprentice”.

Later she worked for President Bill Clinton in the personnel office.

2008 – She wrote and released a book titled, “The Bitch Switch”.  Hmm, this should have been a forewarning to all potential employers.

2010 – She worked on another reality TV show in 2010 with Trump called “The Ultimate Merger”.

2013-02 – Appeared on Trump’s All-Star Celebrity Apprentice.

2016-12- “I am living the American dream because of Donald Trump,” Manigault Newman wrote in a December 2016 guest column for the Hollywood Reporter. “Look at my career, the wealth and exposure that I’ve had: It’s very difficult to make the argument that Donald Trump doesn’t like black people and black women.”

2017-01-03 – It was reported that Omarosa would join Trump’s White House staff, focusing on public engagement.

2017-04 – Married Pastor John Allen Newman at the Trump Hotel in DC.  She also surprised the White House staff by bringing her 39-person bridal party to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for an extended photo shoot. Politico reported that it was unclear if she received formal permission for this event.  She was unable to post her photos because of concerns over ethics and security.

2017-12 – Omarosa is fired by John Kelly, January 20th is supposed to be her last day.  The reason reported appears to be abusing the White House car service known as “CARPET”.  She was using it to get picked up, and dropped off, at the office.

2018-06 – The Jacksonville Golf and Country Club named Omarosa Manigault Newman and her pastor husband John Newman in a minor lawsuit demanding that the couple make fixes to their house.  They owe $11,063 in back fees and charges.  Listed in the lawsuit are mold on the roof, a pool that attracts mosquitoes.  A hearing is set for Oct.15, according to Duval County court records.

2018-07-26 – An announcement is based about Omarosa’s book “Unhinged” is soon to be released.  The date of release appears to be August 14, 2018.   The timed release of her tape collection energizes the sale of her book.

2018-08-13 – Today show interview with Savannah Guthrie. She stated Donald Trump didn’t know she was fire and scorned the president for delegating some duties to Chief of Staff, General John Kelly.  She accused John Kelly of False Imprisonment.a

2008-08-14 – Trump tweets “When you give a crazed, crying lowlife a break, and give her a job at the White House, I guess it just didn’t work out,” Trump wrote. “Good work by General Kelly for quickly firing that dog!”.  There has been some discussion on Trump’s use of the term dog.  A standard vernacular in the English language.

2008-08-23? – Omarosa stated she is ready to testify at Trump’s impeachment trial with the Senate.

In Closing:

Omarosa stated she “never signed the draconian NDA when she started working in the White House.  Given this, she should never have been allowed in the White House Situation Room.   Even Stormy Daniels signed an NDA, hmm, never mind.

She did not have a Security Clearance, she should never have been allowed in the Situation Room.

Things of course, should be changed at the White House in regard to security.    The Situation Room is not a gilded French Provincial Hotel Conference room.

2018/33 Whiner of the Week – John Brennan

Whiner of the Week; John Brennan had his security clearance revoked.
Whiner of the Week; John Brennan had his security clearance revoked.
John Brennan lost his security clearance most likely because of repeated jabs at the President

 

Week 33 of 2018 and this week’s Whiner Of The Week is Ex-CIA Director John Brennan.

On August 15, 2018 White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced that President Trump ordered that Former CIA Director John Brennan security clearance be revoked.

This caused an immediate uproar from the media and Democrats as there is a belief that this is a violation of his free speech.

Security Clearances in America are granted by the Executive Branch of which the President is the leader.

When citizens are offered the privilege of obtaining a clearance it is based on a Need-To-Know.     When a person leaves a project, or their employment, they normally lose access to material protected by that clearance.

In the past it has been an accepted practice for some individuals to temporarily to retain their clearances if they have significant technical or historical information that might be useful to their predecessors.   Over time their value of being called in for discussions is diminished.  The job, Director of CIA certainly qualifies as job where there is value in retaining a former Director’s clearance for some time period for consultation purposes.   A question here is what is an appropriate time period?

The President also has the final word on what is classified, and what is not.  However, in nearly all cases the setting of levels is a task delegated to the security teams of the America’s various agencies.

When employees sign their security clearance contracts they sign up to the idea that they serve at the pleasure of whomever is the President of the United States.  Surely John Brennan realizes this based on the many Security Contracts he must have signed in the past.

They also understand their privilege of a Clearance is based on the need-to-know, and when their employment at a sub-contractor, or within the government terminates, this need-to-know need is substantially reduced.

A Security Clearance is not a lifelong privilege.   It is not a perk.

John Brennan not been CIA Director for nearly 20 months now.  He no longer has a “Need-To-Know”.

John Brennan is no longer serving at the Pleasure of the President.  In fact, he has become adversarial.  He accused the President of treason, which could have a penalty of death.

It is appropriate that his access to Classified Material be terminated.

If an occasion arises in the future where classified information is required, that is only stored in John Brennan’s brain.   Then he could receive a temporary reinstatement of his clearance, and he could be ushered into a SCIF for a discussion.

Some have said that the President’s decision was politically motivated.  Hmm, probably so, the President is a Politician.   What can we say?

Has John Brennan 1st Amendment rights been reduced by the President’s action?  We think not.  In fact he may be inspired to increase his public speaking based on losing his clearances.

Significant Notes:

January of 2013 – Nominated by President Obama to be the Director of the CIA.

March of 2014 – Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, accused the agency of violating constitutional boundaries by spying on the Senate.  Democrat Mark Udall stated, “I have no choice but to call for the resignation of CIA director John Brennan,” Udall said after a briefing on the inspector general’s findings.

July of 2014 – John Brennan was forced to apologize to leaders of the US Senate intelligence committee on Thursday, conceding that under his orders and direction that CIA agency employees spied on US Senate committee staff, reversing months of furious and public denials.

January of 2017 – John Brennan resigns as Director of the CIA in a normal political transition.

March of 2018 – In March 2018, John Brennan tweeted – When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America…America will triumph over you.

July of 2018 – Senator Rand Paul called for his security Clearance to be revoked.

August 15, 2018 – White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders announced that President Trump ordered that Former CIA Director John Brennan security clearance be revoked.

 

2018/26 Whiner of the Week – Maxine Waters

Weekly Whiner; Whiner of the Week
Weekly Whiner; Whiner of the Week
Maxine Waters, House Representative 43rd district

This week’s Weekly Whiner is none other than Maxine Waters, Democrat House Representative from the 43rd district in California.  This last Saturday, June 23rd, Maxine Waters told her supporters at an Los Angeles California rally to confront and harass Trump officials where ever they may go.

“If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” Waters stated.

“This was in response to the booting out of Sarah Huckabee Sanders from the Red Hen restaurant by owner Stephanie Wilkinson for just being a member of the Trump cabinet.

Some Democrats such as Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) stated, “I understand the frustration and the anger she was expressing, and I share a lot of that. I wouldn’t have done it, but I don’t criticize her for doing it.”.

Others such as Adriano Espaillat, (D-NY), stated, “Said he loved Maxine Waters”, and that he supported “it”.

But a number of Democrats, and Republicans, disagreed with her stance and statement for this issue.

On Thursday, June 28th Maxine since she made public comments earlier in the week to encourage protesters to heckle and harass members of the Trump’s Cabinet in public venues, she has received numerous threats and was forced to cancel some of her events.

However, Waters has denied that she ever called for violence, saying she’s only urging peaceful protests.

Significant Events:

1991-Maxine Waters is elected to the 29th district.  She received over 79% of the popular vote.

2010-08-10 – Maxine Waters is charged with three counts of violating House rules and the Federal Ethics code for her efforts in arranging a 2008 meeting between Treasury Officials and OneUnited bank.   However, on 2012-09-25 the House Committee on Ethics concluded that Representative Waters’ chief of state was at fault for creating the appearance of conflict, but Waters was not.

In her 27 years as a House Representative she has successfully been the primary sponsor of 5 bills that were enacted.  The most recent four were within the Obama administration.  These were the following:

Maxine Waters has been criticized for not living within District 43.  However, her house used to be in her district, but redistricting shifted her home into the 37th district.  She should get a pass on this issue.

She has been re-elected 13-14 times.  In 2016 she received over 76% of the popular vote in her district.  Her nearest challenger received 23.9%, an enormous margin.  In 2018 she slipped a bit to 72.3% versus 14.1% for her nearest challenger.  She must be doing something right!

In some sense her playbook is becoming more like President Trump’s.

Question:

Should extremists from the far left and the far right, start harassing their opponents as Maxine Waters suggests?

We think NOT!

2018/25 Whiner of the Week – Stephanie Wilkinson

This week’s Weekly Whiner is Stephanie Wilkinson who owns The Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia.

On June 22nd, Friday evening, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House Press Secretary, made the mistake of having a reservation, under her husband’s name, for the Red Hen Restaurant in Lexington, Virginia.

If the reservation had been in her name, perhaps all of this hullabaloo could have been avoided. The Maître-D could have nixed the reservation saving Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her guests some gas money.

What hullabaloo? Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave, but not her husband, and the others at the table. But they did leave at the same time as her.

In an interview with The Washington Post, Stephanie Wilkinson was reportedly at home when one of the Chef’s called to report that Sarah Huckabee Sanders and some friends were dining at the restaurant.   Some of the restaurant staff are gay and were troubled by having to serve someone from the Trump administration.

So, Ms. Wilkinson drove in and saw that indeed it was Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Ms. Wilkinson asked Sander’s to come out to the patio for a word.  Wilkinson said. “I explained that the restaurant has certain standards that I feel it has to uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation. “, I said, ‘I’d like to ask you to leave.’”

Sanders’s response was immediate, Wilkinson said: “That’s fine. I’ll go.”

The next day Sanders Tweeted the following:

Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so

— Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) June 23, 2018

Restaurant’s legally have the right to ask patrons to leave if they are unruly or improperly dressed.  Everyone has seen signs like, “No shoes, no service”.

Some of the restaurant staff appeared to be somewhat jubilant as a Facebook post of the restaurant whiteboard had the term “86 – Sara Huckabee Sanders”.  The term, “to 86 someone”, is a restaurant industry code to “refuse service”.

But, there could be a need for signs like, “No Republicans”.   It sounds crazy, and we think it is, but it could prevent embarrassing issues such as this occurring.

A recent court case concerning a Baker asked to create a custom cake for a gay couple received national notoriety.  The jist ended up the Baker cannot refuse service to anyone just wanting to buy a ready made cake.  But could refuse service for a custom cake.   A fine line subject to interpretation.  But refusing service here sounds a bit like Old-School Jim Crow practices.

Is this what we want to go back to? Where business could discriminate against people based on the types of customers they want? Stephanie Wilkinson probably believes she did the right thing. But, I am sure the KKK, believes they are correct also. Not a way to run a country.
 
 

Significant Notes:

The staff was not asked to bake a special cake commemorating Sander’s or Trump.  It was just a meal out for friends.  No Art or statements of politics were asked for.  They most likely just ordered from the menu.

From all accounts the Sanders party was not misbehaving.

There were no signs on display to warn people of different political persuasions that they need to steer clear of the Red Hen.  Sarah and her guests were surprised.  Perhaps a sign listing what kind of person should stay out.

Some members appeared jubilant in the success of their endeavors judging from a few of the Facebook and Twitter posts.

Stephanie Wilkinson and her staff should take courses in diversity and tolerance to help them cope with crazy people, such as Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her family.

Stephanie Wilkinson and her staff should either get a backbone, or reconsider their careers working with the public.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders handled herself with aplomb in this situation